Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 20 Jul 2006

On (19 Jul 06) Steve Asher wrote to George Pope...

Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 18 Jul 2006

Posting this in this echo implies you don't believe there can be ANY benign or positive application of this technology. . .

Is that so?

You are free to infer whatever you wish from any post in this echo (or any other echo, or source).

I prefer to hear the actual facts from the person himself, not
infer anything that would have too muh chance of being in error (as
I don't have the benefit of hearing YOUR view on it!)

Read your opening sentence ... you have inferred that I don't believe
there can be ANY benign or positive application (etc). I have no idea
why you would infer that (or why "this" [my post] implies that which
you have inferred), but you are free to do so.

Read what I had said -- by posting in this echo such material, you're implying that you deem it to be on the topic of "conspiracy". . . this concept(conspiracy) is not one that lends itself to positive inferences.

Because I care,
|<+]::-{)} (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))

... nfx v3.1
--- Fringe BBS
* Origin: EWOG II - The Fringe - 904-733-1721 (1:112/91)

Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 08 Aug 2006

Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 20 Jul 2006

On (19 Jul 06) Steve Asher wrote to George Pope...

Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 18 Jul 2006

Posting this in this echo implies you don't believe

there can be

ANY benign or positive application of this technology. . .

Is that so?

You are free to infer whatever you wish from any post in this
echo (or
any other echo, or source).

I prefer to hear the actual facts from the person himself, not
infer anything that would have too muh chance of being in error (as
I don't have the benefit of hearing YOUR view on it!)

Read your opening sentence ... you have inferred that I don't believe
there can be ANY benign or positive application (etc). I have no idea
why you would infer that (or why "this" [my post] implies that which
you have inferred), but you are free to do so.

Read what I had said -- by posting in this echo such material,
you're implying that you deem it to be on the topic of
"conspiracy". . .

I deem it to be on the topic of "conspiracy", which is why I posted it.

this concept(conspiracy) is not one that lends
itself to positive inferences.

You inferred that I don't believe that there can be ANY benign or
positive application of this technology. You are free to infer that,
or anything else you wish. Perhaps you could try to be a little less
rigid in which you infer from various posts. Just a thought.

Cheers, Steve..

---
* Origin: Blaidd Drwg (3:800/432)

On (10 Aug 06) Steve Asher wrote to George Pope...

Read what I had said -- by posting in this echo such material,
you're implying that you deem it to be on the topic of
"conspiracy". . .

I deem it to be on the topic of "conspiracy", which is why I posted
it.

this concept(conspiracy) is not one that lends
itself to positive inferences.

You inferred that I don't believe that there can be ANY benign or
positive application of this technology. You are free to infer that,
or anything else you wish. Perhaps you could try to be a little less
rigid in which you infer from various posts. Just a thought.

You've said, in a roundabout way, that all applications of RFID
technology fall under the category of "conspiracy". . .

Even the benign ones (which you strongly imply are not so)

Because I care,
|<+]::-) (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))


--- PPoint 1.76
* Origin: Cyberpope pointing via Bandmaster BBS! (1:153/715.1275)